Lexus RX 450h

From £43,665
European test route confirms latest 450h is a major step forward

Our Verdict

Lexus RX 2009-2015

Lexus RX 2009-2015

The Lexus RX has headline-grabbing emissions, but do they stand up to scrutiny?

  • First Drive

    Lexus RX 450h F Sport

    Lexus’s F Sport specification takes on BMW’s M Sport and Audi’s S-line, with only partial success

  • First Drive

    Lexus RX 450h

    European test route confirms latest 450h is a major step forward
1 May 2009

What is it?

The second incarnation of Lexus’s SUV, only this time it’s hybrid only – at least in the UK (some European markets and the US get the V6 petrol model, too.) The body’s all new but underneath is a platform shared with the US-market Toyota Highlander and the drivetrain is an evolution of the RX400h’s.

So that means the same set-up, with the same CVT gearbox containing a motor and a second motor in the back axle. The clever bit, the power management unit, is new – it's smaller, lighter and more efficient – and the engine, still a V6, now runs on the Atkinson cycle, which does a better job of turning petrol into energy. It’s heavy though –over two tonnes and 70kg more than the 400h.

Lexus claims an admirable 148g/km of CO2, which makes it the least likely SUV to contribute to global meltdown, and 44.8mpg – impressive figures for a car in this class.

And because this is the Euro-spec RX, it gets retuned suspension and a retuned power management unit that will provide better off the line acceleration but still (Lexus claims) return comparable fuel consumption.

What’s it like?

Strongly reminiscent of the 400h, but about 50 per cent better all round. Inside the quality’s improved and there’s a new infotainment controller that replaces the touch screen system with an iDrive style central control unit. This one resembles a computer mouse – you move a cursor round the screen with a joystick. Lexus calls it Remote Touch and it works well, and will find its way into other Lexus models soon.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Drive it and you’ll find that seamless, smooth drivetrain that characterises Toyota’s hybrid products. Unfortunately that means the engine still sounds bland and is neutered by the on-off gearbox – it seems to reduce the V6 to the role of a generator rather than a integral part of the car’ character.

But the handling and ride is much better. It’s calm and resolved at speed, and feels well tied down on the twisty Hungarian B-roads I tried it on – the new electronic roll bars (Lexus calls it Active Stabiliser System) help, but even without them the RX is flop free and precise, which makes it comfortable and easy to hustle through windy roads quickly. You might even enjoy yourself…

Unusually for a European-based car launch, we got to drive on some really rough roads, too, which the RX dealt with competently if not brilliantly – some of the bigger potholes sent shudders through the body frame.

The car didn’t quite live up to its fuel consumption claims – the best I got was 38mpg, the worst 27mpg, but that was after an hour of pushing it hard. If you were deliberately careful 44mpg should be possible.

Should I buy one?

The RX450h does a good job of fulfilling the role of a “green” SUV, with its low CO2 output and decent fuel consumption. You may be somewhat less taken by the pricing, though – it starts at £41,600, which is more than an X5 3.0d or an ML 320 CDi. And the range-topper is the £55,505 SE-L Premium, more than the top flight X5, X6 or ML. The Lexus is better equipped. though. and significantly cleaner, but you’re paying a premium for the virtue.

Dan Stevens

Join the debate

Comments
15

tommallett

4 February 2009

[quote Autocar]There is a minor penalty in fuel economy for this power [/quote]

Seriously...the fuel economy was awful before, I never managed to get more than about 25mpg before and its awful to drive, so thats not even driving spiritedly.

Vanquish

5 February 2009

I liked the old RX, but this thing looks dated already, those rear lights are like the MK1 RX, its all gone backwards. Might look better in the metal but I don't like what I see so far.

glorfindel

7 February 2009

According to me, it's one of the ugliest suv on yhe market.

theonlydt

8 February 2009

By the way - at the moment it reads "emphasis is on comfort rather than ecology". I get the feeling you mean "economy".

Squonk61

9 February 2009

The concept of trying to make hybrid things this size is lost on me (more packaging opportunities aside) - you want ecology (I think it was meant) you just buy something slightly smaller than Lichtenstein.Or you just make it a little smaller and lighter..

But the to make a new one and reduce its economy? And release it in the current financial climate?

Just what are those guys smoking?

Hookey

28 March 2009

The article quotes 2 mpg figures: in the text 32.4mpg (UK) and in the yellow data box below 44.8mpg. Quite a difference. Can you clarify which of the mpg figures is more representative?

Audi Tastic

1 May 2009

Are these things congestion charge free?

tommallett

1 May 2009

[quote Hookey]The article quotes 2 mpg figures: in the text 32.4mpg (UK) and in the yellow data box below 44.8mpg. Quite a difference. Can you clarify which of the mpg figures is more representative?[/quote]

25mpg.

Lanehogger

1 May 2009

Second incarnation of Lexus' SUV? Make that third generation Autocar. Do your homework!

Penny9966

2 May 2009

With the savings (on the aussie market alone) most people would go for the V6 unless they really wanted the green credential. For the premium of the hybrid, I for one could not justify the cost!

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week