The S-Cross is quite low-rise by crossover standards, but has a raised and convenient driving position and a big split-level boot. It isn’t the most muscular or aggressive-looking pseudo-4x4, but the styling’s neat and inoffensive: probably spot on for the brand’s retiring demographic.
Inside, the car’s fairly roomy, but not huge. In equipment-rich SZ5 trim, the panoramic sunroof does eat into second-row headroom quite a bit; so much so that you wouldn’t want to put taller adults back there.
With a normal roof, passenger space is competitive – but lags behind what’s available in a 3008 or even a Skoda Yeti. Cabin quality is a bit ordinary, with only a few ritzy soft-touch finishes, but it’s all functional, hard-wearing stuff. It’s unadorned, sure – but for the price, it’s more than acceptable.
And broadly in line with what we found on the European test drive, the Suzuki handles well: cleanly, with admirable precision and even a little zest. The power steering’s quite direct and feels substantial, and spring rates are slightly higher than the crossover norm, for a nicely clipped B-road ride.
An occasional bit of thumping harshness in the ride at low speed comes as the trade off, and between that, some wind noise and the slight gruffness of the diesel engine, you certainly wouldn’t call the S-Cross particularly refined. But it’s nicely damped, and handles better than it needs to for the money.
Performance from the 1.6-litre Fiat-sourced diesel engine is good, and economy likewise. We saw better than 50mpg from the trip computer, on a cross-country route and with the four-wheel drive system engaged for a good chunk of it.
Experience suggests that’s a good deal better than an equivalent 3008 or Vauxhall Mokka will serve up – and the official CO2 claims seem to confirm as much.